Skip to main content Deutsch

Detail

Sven Rudolf Hauck
Dr. med. Sven Rudolf Hauck

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy
Position: Doctor-in-training

sven.hauck@meduniwien.ac.at

Research group(s)

Research interests

My research focus is endovascular aortic repair, may it be in the arch, thoracoabdominal or abdominal, with special regard to the different stentgrafts used. My ultimate goal is to further improve patient experience and outcomes. In order to reach this goal we are evaluating currently available devices, analyzing and highlighting potential for improvement and actively develop new solutions. This is facilitated by a multidisciplinary working environment in conjunction with the cardiac and vascular surgery under personal guidance from Assoc. Prof. Martin Funovics.

Selected publications

  1. Hauck, S.R. et al. (2022) ‘Branched versus fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the aortic arch: A multicenter comparison’, The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 164(5), pp. 1379-1389.e1. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.03.023.
  2. Hauck, S.R. et al. (2022) ‘Applicability of endovascular branched and fenestrated aortic arch repair devices to treat residual type A dissection after ascending replacement’, Journal of Vascular Surgery, 76(6), pp. 1440–1448. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.018.
  3. Hauck, S.R. et al. (2022) ‘Structural failure in bridging stentgrafts for branched endovascular aneurysm repair: a case–control study’, Insights into Imaging, 13(1). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01196-6.
  4. Hauck, S.R. et al. (2021) ‘Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair of the Ascending Aorta: Assessment of a Specific Novel Stent-Graft Design in Phantom, Cadaveric, and Clinical Application’, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 44(9), pp. 1448–1455. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02859-5.
  5. Hauck, S.R. et al. (2022) ‘Use of a Steerable Sheath for Completely Femoral Access in Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair Compared to Upper Extremity Access’, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology, 45(6), pp. 744–751. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03064-8.