Skip to main content English


Peter Homolka
Ao. Univ.Prof. Dipl.-Ing. Dr.techn. Peter Homolka

Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering
Position: Associate Professor

ORCID: 0000-0002-2300-3015
T +43 1 40400 17130


Diagnostic Imaging; Medical Physics; Radiation Protection; Radiation, Ionizing; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Research interests

Prof. Homolka's main research interests are linked to digital x-ray imaging and interventional radiology physics and dosimetry. This includes optimization of procedures, determination of radiation doses, Dose reference levels and imaging hardware. Recently application of 3D printing in the design and production of radiological phantoms for both, dosimetry and procedure optimization, became a main focus. With regard to teaching, the education and training of clinical medical physicists and medical Physics PhD candidates are Dr. Homolka's major concerns. Other teaching assignments include basic courses for BME and physics master students on imaging physics and current CT technology, and medical physics and radiation protection on Bacc level.

Techniques, methods & infrastructure

Our dosimetry lab offers reference grade dosimeter systems including PTW electrometer systems with an assortment of ion chambers, semiconductor devices and TLDs. In the X-ray lab a Bucky system, a fluoroscopy and a portable x-ray system are ready to use. Additive manufacturing is available trough the 3D printing lab at our department.

Selected publications

  1. Hojreh, A. et al., 2018. Automated tube voltage selection in pediatric non-contrast chest CT G. E. Woloschak, ed. PLOS ONE, 13(10), p.e0204794. Available at:
  2. Homolka, P. et al., 2017. Design of a head phantom produced on a 3D rapid prototyping printer and comparison with a RANDO and 3M lucite head phantom in eye dosimetry applications. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 62(8), pp.3158-3174. Available at:
  3. Homolka, P. et al., 2014. Ergebnisse der Österreichischen CT-Dosisstudie 2010: Effektive Dosen der häufigsten CT-Untersuchungen und Unterschiede zwischen Anwendern. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik, 24(3), pp.224-230. Available at:
  4. Hojreh, A. et al., 2015. Schutz des ungeborenen Lebens bei diagnostischen und interventionellen radiologischen Verfahren. Der Radiologe, 55(8), pp.663-672. Available at:
  5. Beer, A. et al., 2003. Correlation of insertion torques with bone mineral density from dental quantitative CT in the mandible. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 14(5), pp.616-620. Available at: